The Basics
McVities Jaffa Cake
|
This is the bench mark Jaffa Cake, the Model T Ford of Jaffa Cakes, developed by McVities at the end of the Second World War apparently. Why in this time of rationing they decided to come up with a new sponge cake and chocolate based product who knows? Still McVities did and sixty years later they are going stronger than ever.
|
The basic Jaffa cake design is the marrying of three elements; a sponge cake base, an orange jam center and a dark chocolate covering. Each one plays a crucial role and each one gets us embroiled in some form of protracted argument, which we’ll skip for the time being. The Jaffa cake fuses its three elements seamlessly to create a taste and texture that we instantly appreciate. The bitterness of the dark chocolate is complemented by the sweetness of the jam and its zesty orange flavour enhanced and carried to our tastebuds and palette by the chocolate. The sponge base provides a space for these sweet flavours to pause briefly and express themselves, whilst its insubstantialness is the main culprit for the speed at which the Jaffa cakes disappear.
|
Although a standard pack of Jaffa Cakes holds 12, when helping ones self it’s more natural to think in terms of the height of the stack which one can acquire. As soon as the available Jaffa supply dwindles to single digit figures tension arises. This is one of the biggest arguments against those little three packs that you get in cafes and on trains as opposed to bringing your own twin 24 pack.
Lately McVities have been trying to make us feel even better about eating Jaffa Cakes by telling us that there is only 1 gram of fat per cake (less than half that of a Digestive). It's also woth mentioning that all the other Jaffas we reviewed exceeded this figure.
So if the Jaffa Cake is so perfect why mess about with it? Well I suppose with something so popular there is a good chance we’ll be curious to try something new. If we don’t like it we’ll probably just console ourselves with a big old box of the originals so its a win win situation.
|
|
New flavours
McVities Lemon and Lime Jaffa cakes
|
Not straying too far from the basic formula, swapping one citrus fruit for two others, this would seem on the face of it the easiest one to pull off. Wrong. The problem here is that we know the smashing orangey bit in the middle so well, that we think we understand its precise taste relationship to an orange. In what is described by McVities as industrial jam, and by me just now as a clear hard set marmalade, we can clearly pick out proper orange juice and zest flavours.
|
So we approach the lemon and lime Jaffa Cakes with a weight of expectation, to find that rather than Roses Lemon and Lime marmalade the flavour is more confectionary, with nods towards Lemon Drops and Lime fruit gums. Perhaps because these flavours occur so widely in other sweet foods we can easily be pulled off in to such comparisons. Sadly these new Jaffa cakes don’t seem to have the presence of their orange forebearers.
McVities Blackcurrent Jaffa Cakes
So now we move away from the Citrus fruit into berries, territory scouted out last year by Limited Edition McVities Berry Blast Jaffa Cakes which featured a mixture of raspberry and cherry. Straight comparisons with the original don’t come galloping into view and the blackcurrent flavour is left to speak for itself. I thought it spoke in a slightly German accent putting me in mind of a black forest gateaux. The jam had good sharpness, and the flavour was certainly more reminiscent of the pound and half pick of your own blackcurrents we bagged last summer than solidified Ribenna. This new Jaffa cake could almost be its own man.
|
|
|
Jamectomies
As I have found out taking meaningful photos of the smashing bits in the middle of Jaffa Cakes is far from easy. It just ends up looking like a little shiny bit black glass. So we have performed jamectomies on McVities new range so you can see for yourselves what's in there.
Top smashing orangey bit, left smashing lemon and lime bit and bottom smashing blackcurrenty bit
|
|
Variations on a theme
Cadburys Milk Chocolate Jaffa Cake
A question we get asked quite often at NiceCupOfTeaAndASitDown is how come every man and his dog can call their products Jaffa Cakes? Doesn’t somebody own the rights to use this name? Well evidently not, as the shelves are stacked full of them, supermarket own label as well as those from manufacturers other than McVities. We assume that trademarking the name Jaffa Cake wasn’t high up on the McVities to-do list.
|
Any how enter Cadburys, or more correctly Burton’s with their Cadbury Milk Chocolate covered Jaffa Cake. Burton’s have been going great guns for the last couple of years chucking Cadbury’s chocolate over all sorts of biscuits to great effect. It was only matter of time, considering that they have been making their own Jaffa Cakes for years, before the Cadbury’s Milk Chocolate Jaffa Cake appeared.
|
To some this is a much more significant alteration than changing the flavour of the jam. As we said in the Jaffa cake equation plain chocolate has always been required to make the whole thing balance. Could it be made to work with the sweeter less domineering milk chocolate? Well just, but the winner here is the orange flavour. Picking out the jam and putting it one on one with the McVities jam its not quite as zesty. None the less it still dominates the Cadburys chocolate so completely taste wise that it’s not at all clear that it has even turned up.
|
|
Bahlsen Messino Continental Jaffa Cakes
|
Not exactly a newcomer this one though many people have yet to try it, which is why its almost always on some kind of offer. German bakers Bahlsen have interpreted the basic Jaffa Cake formula but given it some important tweeks in almost every aspect in a bid to build a luxury product. A BMW if you will to our Ford, although hopefully not feeling that it has some God given right to run the rest of us lesser mortals off the roads and with out even bothering to use its indicators at a major junction as such tawdry details are below its stature. Yes I’m losing the metaphor there somewhat.
|
So what’s going on under the hood? Well the jam is all different, for the get go. Texture wise its much more like a dense and fruity jam than a clear set marmalade. The flavour is authentically orangey perhaps due to real orange pulp finding its way in there. Not only that but it extends right to the edges of the cake, flush. It’s ever so slightly thinner than its pectin packed cousins, but as many have suspected them of systematically shrinking in diameter over the years it has little to worry about on that front.
|
|
The sponge base seems much more related to the sort of sponge cake one would make at home rather than those of the classic Jaffa Cake, and the chocolate covering is a good quality dark continental style one. What is noticeable apart from the rounded rectangular shape is the effect the jam texture has on the whole eating experience. In a classic Jaffa cake we are used to the chocolate and jam parting company as one bites in. Indeed the smashing orangey bit can be peeled away from both jam and sponge to provide a plethora of eating possibilities for those with enough self discipline not scoff them down in one.
The Bahlsen offering is solidly glued together by its jam making any chances of a complete jam-ectomy virtually nil.
The Bahlsen Messino is important reminder that there are other sorts of Jaffa Cakes out there that push the same buttons. The bags of Mini-Jaffa Cakes carried by many supermarkets as own brand have much more in common with the Messino than the McVities.
Have they lost the plot?
LU Pims Citron Mousse
|
Right we are going right out on a limb here and taking a look at the latest development in LU Pims range, although these too have apparently been around for a while, I had just not noticed them. The basic LU Pims with orange jam is effectively a French Jaffa cake. Other versions exist with lemon and pear flavoured jam but we’ve never cut them enough slack to investigate those. The main distinguishing feature of the Pims is its elaborate chocolate top shell whose embossed Pims logo I would imagine is meant to evoke the sealing of letters and documents with wax. The whole thing has the feel of being created separately and assembled to form the finished item, in a fashion similar to that other LU staple, the Petit Ecolier biscuit. As such the jam based Pims are even more prone to disassembly than our own Jaffa cakes, but other than that are unremarkable.
|
However on our last raiding mission to France’s northern ports we secured a pack of mousse based Pims. Citron flavour which is french for a lemon not a type of car (insert your own Jeremy Clarkson French car joke here). LU boldly decided to mess with the very power plant of the Jaffa Cake and swapped out the whole jammy bit for some ‘stuff’ which they are calling mousse. Could we see similar innovations this side of the channel? I doubt it. The mousse is much like something that used to be something else, in the way that ice cream that has been mashed up with a spoon till its melted and gone gloopy is not really ice cream any more. I don’t know what the mousse used to be but it wasn’t that great either, having flavour like one of those pale coloured chewy French sweets rather than a lemon. I would say mousse cakes are going to stay a largely French phenomena much like the Renault Twingo.
|
|
Cake or Biscuit?
|
|
No discussion of the Jaffa Cake can be complete with out recourse to the age old cake or biscuit question. Or to put it another way if I don’t deal with this I’ll be getting emails about it till next Christmas. We’ve tackled this all before on the site and in our book but if you haven’t got round to reading either of those then here is a lightning quick summary. So deep breath here we go...
|
Surprise surprise the Jaffa Cake is indeed a cake which is why they named called it that.
Its base is made from sponge cake, not biscuit, they must have been thinking about that when they called it a Jaffa Cake.
Yes, yes, we are only to well aware of the theory that biscuits take up moisture when the go stale becoming limp conversely a cake looses it becoming hard, thus proving the Jaffa Cake to be a cake as its bottom is made of sponge cake as we already know. This is all well and good but has several noticeable exceptions such as the Fig roll and so cannot be relied upon. Better just to say its a cake.
Equally enticing but flawed is the idea that cakes contain eggs especially sponges like in the case of the Jaffa Cakes sponge bottom. Therefore biscuits simply are eggless baked things. Well that makes the Almond biscuit a cake so no luck there.
I know they sell them along with the biscuits, in packs just like biscuits, and McVities is a brand of United Biscuits (who also make cakes) but it’s still a small cake.
Some people are confused by the size and think that to be a cake something has to be quite big. Well that’s just a slur on those big bags of madeleines favoured by Marcel Proust or Mr Kiplings more diminutive offerings such his 8 packs of French Fancies.
Yes the VAT man wanted it to be a biscuit. That way it would fall by virtue of its chocolate coat into a category of products liable to VAT at the standard rate, i.e. luxury biscuits. As a cake however it is zero rated for VAT, no matter how luxuriant, much to the VAT man’s continuing annoyance. In fact Wifey and I once had a chat with ex Tory Minister John Knott who brought in VAT when the Conservative Government of the time took Britain into the Common Market. He recalled that the whole VAT introduction went surprisingly well expect for the Jaffa cake which caused all sorts of problems. In 1991 the matter went to a tribunal (number 6344 in case you were wondering) in which the VAT man argued that the Jaffa wasn’t a cake and so should not be exempt from VAT (VATA 1983 Sch 5 Group 1 excepted item 2), trotting out all the old arguments. McVities countered with all of the other old arguments plus a specially prepared 12 inch Jaffa Cake, which focused the tribunal’s attention on the sponge base. The tribunal concluded that, while the product also had characteristics of biscuits or confectionery which was not cake, it had sufficient characteristics of cakes to be a cake for the purposes of zero-rating. (The tribunal also determined that the product was not a biscuit.)
Finally despite all of this Wifey still thinks they are biscuits.
|
|
|